Question

When shortages are discovered after a training event, who decides if the shortages are legitimate?

a. Company commander
b. Range Ammunition NCO
c. Unit personnel
d. ASP personnel

Answer 1

In the aftermath of a training event, when shortages are identified, the responsibility for determining their legitimacy primarily rests with the unit personnel.

Explanation;

These individuals, often including the unit supply officer and other designated personnel, are tasked with assessing the discrepancies in equipment or supplies. While the company commander may be involved in overseeing the process, the unit personnel play a crucial role in investigating and validating shortages before escalating the matter further. This approach ensures a streamlined and efficient resolution at the unit level, reducing the need for involvement from higher-ranking officials or external logistics personnel. The decentralized nature of this decision-making process allows for a swift and accurate assessment of the legitimacy of shortages, facilitating the timely correction of discrepancies in training event resources.

Answer 2

The company commander decides if the shortages are legitimate during a training event.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of a training event, when shortages are discovered, the responsibility of deciding if the shortages are legitimate falls on the Company commander. The company commander is the highest-ranking officer in the company and has the authority to assess and determine the legitimacy of the shortages.

The Range Ammunition NCO (Non-Commissioned Officer) is responsible for managing and maintaining the range ammunition. While they may offer input, the final decision rests with the company commander.

Unit personnel and ASP (Ammunition Supply Point) personnel may be involved in the process of reporting and investigating shortages, but they do not have the authority to independently decide if the shortages are legitimate or not.