Final answer:
Lincoln was not a radical abolitionist at the time of his election in 1860, as his position was centered on stopping the expansion of slavery. The Thirteenth Amendment was not quickly accepted by border states, making the claim that they willingly implemented it false. The Civil War began as a fight to preserve the Union but became a conflict to end slavery with the introduction of the Emancipation Proclamation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 1860, but it's false to categorize him as a radical abolitionist at the time of his election. His platform was centered on preventing the expansion of slavery into new territories, not immediate abolition. Lincoln's stance was considered moderate compared to radicals of his time. Rather, Lincoln's election was seen as a threat by the South because it signified the possibility of a future where slavery could not expand, which ultimately led to the secession of eleven Southern states and the onset of the Civil War.
The war initially began as a conflict to preserve the Union, but as it progressed, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, making the abolition of slavery a central war goal. The Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery, was not readily accepted by the Border States; they did not quickly implement Lincoln's proposals for gradual compensated emancipation, rendering this statement false.