146k views
3 votes
Which of these statements is a good summary of discriminant validity?

A. Measures that do not represent all parts of the construct are not good measures.
B. A measure probably is not reasonable if it does not sound reasonable.
C. Measures of two unrelated constructs should not correlate strongly.

User Jhansen
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Discriminant validity refers to the extent to which a measure is not strongly correlated with unrelated constructs, ensuring that the tool accurately assesses the targeted concept.

Step-by-step explanation:

A good summary of discriminant validity is that measures of two unrelated constructs should not correlate strongly. Discriminant validity is about ensuring that a test does not closely relate to variables with which it shouldn't theoretically have an association. It is a component of construct validity that is focused on whether a measurement tool measures the construct it's intended to measure.

For example, if you were measuring academic ability with a test, you would expect it to have a low correlation with unrelated constructs like physical endurance. Hence, discriminant validity ensures that when instruments are used for psychological research, they measure constructs in a way that is not conflated with other variables that are not of interest in that particular study.

User Rahul Chaudhari
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.