Final answer:
Countries with strong religious or political barriers, and those protecting their cultural industries, are less likely to embrace hip hop. Despite these barriers, hip hop has become a resilient global phenomenon, spreading through both hierarchical and reverse hierarchical diffusion.
Step-by-step explanation:
Countries that have strong religious or political objections to Western influences tend not to embrace hip hop. This lack of embrace can stem from a variety of barriers such as technological limitations, cultural incompatibilities, or biases that slow the adoption of new cultural expressions like hip hop. Often, it is in places where there are serious repercussions, like social stigma or legal consequences, on consuming this genre of music. For instance, in some conservative regions of Pakistan, hip hop is seen as incompatible with local religious beliefs, leading to acts of violence against music stores. Moreover, even businesses that could have played a role in the diffusion of hip hop, like Motown Records, initially resisted the genre. Despite that, hip hop has demonstrated strong patterns of diffusion and adaptation globally, showing its resilience and appeal as a form of cultural expression.