Final answer:
Without more context, 'hurts vs. Florida' does not appear to be a recognized legal case related to the concept of retroactivity. When laws or decisions are retroactive, they are applied to past events; however, the mentioned case is not identifiable with provided details.
Step-by-step explanation:
When asking if 'hurts vs. Florida' is retroactive, it seems that you may be inquiring about a legal decision and its effects on past events or judgments. However, without more context, it's important to note that there may be confusion in the question as 'hurts vs. Florida' does not appear to be a recognized legal case or decision as of the current knowledge cutoff date. Legal cases that are deemed retroactive are applied to events that occurred before the law or decision was put into place. This typically involves a court decision that may affect the outcome of past court cases or adjudications.
If 'hurts' refers to a different case or legal principle that I am not aware of due to the cutoff date or if it's a typo, please provide additional context or clarification. For accurate and specific information pertaining to legal concepts like retroactivity, it is often best to consult legal databases or contact legal professionals.