Final answer:
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona, Florida revised its death penalty sentencing laws to require that the jury's recommendation for death must be unanimous, changing from previous legislation that allowed a simple majority or a recommendation by a majority of the jury.
Step-by-step explanation:
After the Ring v. Arizona case, Florida made significant changes to its death penalty sentencing procedure. The Supreme Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona dictated that only a jury, not a judge, could find the factual circumstances necessary to impose the death penalty. Following this ruling, the Florida legislature passed a law requiring that the jury's recommendation for death must be unanimous. Prior to this change, a simple majority or a recommendation by a majority of the jury was sufficient for a judge to impose a death sentence.
Moreover, to comply with the constitutional requirements established by the Supreme Court, Florida's high court also had to address and modify the state's sentencing procedures. These modifications aimed to ensure that the defendant's rights to a fair trial and due process were protected in capital cases, which are aligned with the Sixth Amendment's guarantees concerning trial by an impartial jury.