Final answer:
Procedural fairness is a deontological approach that focuses on fair procedures, while distributive fairness is a consequentialist approach that evaluates fairness based on outcomes. This statement is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Procedural fairness and distributive fairness are two different approaches to understanding and achieving fairness in society.
Procedural fairness is a deontological approach, which means it focuses on the actions and processes involved in making decisions and distributing resources. It emphasizes the importance of following fair procedures and adhering to ethical principles, regardless of the outcome. For example, a fair trial with unbiased judges and proper evidence presentation is considered procedurally fair, even if the outcome is unfavorable to one party.
Distributive fairness, on the other hand, is a consequentialist approach that evaluates fairness based on the outcomes or consequences. It considers the distribution of wealth, goods, and services in society and aims to achieve a fair allocation that maximizes overall welfare. For example, an equal distribution of resources among individuals to ensure everyone has their basic needs met would be considered distributively fair.
In conclusion, the statement that procedural fairness is a deontological approach and distributive fairness is a consequentialist approach is true.