Final answer:
The statement is true. Public disclosure of SAP information through mechanisms like FOIA does not equate to declassification, nor does it provide authorization to disseminate that information. Sensitive information can remain classified or restricted despite being partially released to the public.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that public disclosure approval of Special Access Program (SAP) information does not automatically mean the information is now declassified, nor does it authorize individuals to confirm, deny, or disclose that information is true. When information is released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or similar laws like the Sunshine Act, it may still be restricted or redacted to protect sensitive details. Even when some information is made available to the public, there may still be constraints on confirming, denying, or discussing the details of that information. This is due to the fact that the information may still be classified or sensitive for national security reasons, proprietary reasons, or because it contains personal or private data.
For example, a CIA document might have sections that are redacted, which indicates that even though the document has been released under FOIA, portions of it remain sensitive and are exempt from disclosure. Similarly, meetings under the Sunshine Act that discuss classified information or other exempted subjects cannot be fully disclosed to the public. In both cases, it's imperative that the disclosure does not jeopardize security interests or infringe on privacy. This illustrates an aspect of responsive bureaucracy in attempting to find a balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information.