Final answer:
Conze's criticism of modern Buddhists likely revolves around concerns for the integrity and authenticity of Buddhist teachings amidst changes in cultural contexts and globalization.
Step-by-step explanation:
It seems that the main discussion point here is the criticism by Conze of modern Buddhists. Without more context, it's hard to provide a detailed analysis, but generally speaking, Edward Conze, a famous 20th-century Buddhist scholar, has been known to critique various aspects of modern interpretations and practices of Buddhism. Conze's criticisms could be directed towards the perceived dilution or misinterpretation of traditional Buddhist doctrines and practices amid changing cultural contexts and the process of globalization. He might address issues such as the commodification of Buddhist teachings, the westernization of practices, or the loss of focus on important elements of the Buddhist path, such as meditation and the realization of anatta (non-self). These views would reflect a concern for maintaining the integrity and authenticity of Buddhist teachings as they are adopted and adapted by modern Buddhists in non-traditional settings.