Final answer:
The student's query is about knowledge and the concept of justified true belief (JTB), specifically addressing the condition that true knowledge should not be inferred from any false premises, as per Gilbert Harman's criterion of no false lemmas.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim "In indirectly aware of each other, 2 fundamental requirements are satisfied" can be connected to the philosophical investigation into knowledge, in particular, the justification of belief and the criteria by which we regard something as true knowledge. The student's question seems to associate with the ideas by philosophers such as Dharmakīrti and Gilbert Harman regarding the conditions for knowledge—specifically, the concept of justified true belief (JTB) and the criterion of no false lemmas introduced by Harman.
Gilbert Harman proposed an addition to the JTB account by including no false lemmas. A lemma refers to a premise or step in the reasoning process, and Harman posited that true knowledge cannot be based on any inference that uses false premises.
According to Harman, for someone to truly know a proposition (P), the following conditions must be satisfied:
- P is true.
- The individual (S) believes P.
- S is justified in believing P.
- No part of S's inference of P is based on falsehoods.
In summary, if the belief in question was inferred through any false premises, then even if the belief turns out to be true, it cannot be considered knowledge under the criteria proposed by Harman.