Final answer:
Jocelyn might suspect plagiarism in Alexis' paper due to the absence of proper attribution for a copied internet passage and lack of practices that demonstrate academic integrity, as shown by a comparison with Lily Tran's ethical research practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jocelyn may think that Alexis' paper is plagiarized because it lacks proper attribution indicating that the words or ideas came from another source. A key indication of plagiarism is when a student copies a passage from the internet or another source word for word without using quotation marks or citing the author, as occurred in the example provided. Furthermore, in a professional setting like Lily Tran's example of synthesizing information, merely combining sources without clear acknowledgment of each source can be considered plagiarism. Academic integrity demands that all sources be properly credited to avoid the perception of plagiarism and to maintain the writer's credibility.
Additionally, elements such as the evaluation of author credibility and the consideration of counterclaims indicate an awareness of the rhetorical situation and a deeper engagement with the source material, which may be lacking in Alexis' paper. This could further lead Jocelyn to suspect plagiarism due to the absence of such academic practices, which are expected in higher educational settings, as demonstrated by the structured and ethical approach in Lily Tran's work.