Final answer:
Jackie's childhood, marked by privilege and wealth due to her father's status, indicates an upbringing in the upper echelons of society. Wealthy parents typically gear their children towards success and influence. Intergenerational and intragenerational mobility further explain shifts in societal class across generations or within an individual's lifetime.
Step-by-step explanation:
The content loaded question regarding Jackie's childhood suggests that she experienced a life of privilege because her father was wealthy and her family was part of the upper class in society. This background implies that Jackie would have been socialized into the customs, norms, and expectations of the wealthy. In the context of U.S. society, families with old money have typically held high prestige and have their children socialized accordingly. Wealthy parents tend to prepare their children for white-collar employment and roles of authority. However, the statement that wealthy parents are not concerned about their children's rebellion or that they never engage in repetitive tasks is generally false. There is also a distinction between 'old money' and 'new money', both of which may afford the same financial comfort but hold different social standings.
Regarding intragenerational mobility, the scenario where an executive belongs to a different class than her parents is an example of this. It illustrates how an individual's class can change within their own lifetime. This is reflective of societal changes and can show patterns of intergenerational mobility where wealth and status can either be maintained, lost, or gained across generations.