Final answer:
Fideists would argue that apologetics should avoid engaging in a philosophical defense of the Christian faith, suggesting that philosophy undermines the core principles of faith by elevating reason above divine revelation.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Fideists, apologetics should not engage in a philosophical defense of the Christian faith. Fideism posits that religious belief relies primarily on faith rather than reason or evidence. Fideists would likely argue that by engaging in philosophical arguments to defend faith, we inadvertently place human reason above divine revelation. They may contend that this undermines the core principles of faith, therefore, suggesting a negative response to philosophical defense in apologetics, aligning most closely with option B: 'No, philosophy undermines the core principles of faith.'
However, historical context shows that philosophy and theology have been interwoven, with early Christian apologists engaging with philosophy. Justin Martyr, for example, understood Christ as the Logos—a concept adapted from philosophy. Despite this, Fideists would argue against the assimilation of philosophy into apologetics, seeing faith as self-sufficient and beyond the purview of human philosophy.