Final answer:
Fideists assert that science and faith operate in separate domains and that faith does not require empirical justification. They would likely choose answer B, emphasizing that science cannot substantiate matters beyond material phenomena such as religious beliefs.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Fideists, science should not be used to defend the Christian faith. Rather, they believe that faith is a domain that is beyond the reach of empirical evidence and scientific inquiry. Fideists would likely choose answer B: No, science and faith operate in separate domains. This perspective holds that while science is a powerful tool for gaining knowledge about the material world, evidencing technological revolutions and informing about natural phenomena, it is not equipped to address matters of morality, aesthetics, or spirituality. Moreover, fideism underlines a form of belief that stands independent of reason and that involves a commitment to religious tenets without reliance on scientific proof or evidence.
In the context of Christianity, there are varied opinions on the use of science in apologetics, with some arguing that reason can partially justify religious beliefs but complete understanding requires faith. The relationship between faith and reason is complex, with different theological traditions taking divergent stands on whether and how science can be used to support religious doctrines. Fideism, specifically, suggests that attempts to prove beliefs through scientific means are not only unnecessary but also inappropriate, as faith is recognized as a personal and internally justified belief system that does not necessitate external validation.