Question

When is speaking out against something an act of whistle-blowing and when is it not, according to Bok? What are the two main conditions?

a) Internal channels and public acclaim
b) Significant harm and exhausted internal channels
c) Personal benefit and company loyalty
d) None of the above

Answer 1

Whistle-blowing according to Bok is when there is significant harm and all internal channels for resolution have been exhausted.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to Bok, speaking out against something becomes an act of whistle-blowing when two main conditions are fulfilled: significant harm is being caused, and the whistleblower has exhausted internal channels for addressing the issue. Therefore, the correct answer is b) Significant harm and exhausted internal channels. Whistle-blowing is not simply airing grievances or seeking attention; it involves a serious concern about wrongdoing within an organization that could not be resolved through the usual organizational structures.