Final answer:
Duska believes loyalty should be reserved for individuals and not corporations, which are designed to serve shareholder interests and are separate legal entities that carry the legal consequences of actions, distinct from the individuals who work for them.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question revolves around the opinion of Ronald Duska, who critiques the notion of corporate loyalty. The correct answer to why Duska thinks that a company is not a proper object of loyalty is that b) Loyalty should be reserved for individuals. Duska argues against the idea of employee loyalty to corporations because corporations, as legal entities, are designed primarily to serve the interests of shareholders rather than the interests or well-being of the employees. The historical development of the corporation, as seen with the Dutch East India Trading Company, underscores the nature of corporations as legal entities separate from the individuals within them. This separation means that businesses can engage in practices without individuals bearing the legal consequences, with only financial penalties typically applied to the business entity, a point which has implications on loyalty expectations.