Question

Does Duska think that employees have an obligation of loyalty to their companies? Why or why not?

A) Yes, employees have an obligation of loyalty to their companies because they willingly accept benefits from the organization.

B) No, Duska argues that employees should prioritize their personal values over any loyalty obligations to their companies.

C) Yes, employees have an absolute obligation of loyalty, even if it conflicts with their personal values.

D) No, Duska believes that loyalty is irrelevant in the professional context, and employees should act solely in their self-interest.

Answer 1

Dusk emphasizes a balanced approach to employee loyalty, acknowledging its importance without advocating for an absolute obligation, especially when it conflicts with personal values.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks whether Dusk believes employees have an obligation of loyalty to their companies. According to Dusk's viewpoint on business ethics, the options provided do not totally align with his core ideas. Dusk reasons that while employees do have certain moral responsibilities towards their employer due to the employer-employee relationship, these do not amount to an absolute obligation of loyalty, especially if such loyalty conflicts with their personal values or ethical standards. Thus, Dusk likely advocates for a balanced approach, recognizing the importance of the company-employee relationship while also acknowledging the rights of employees to act according to their moral compass.