Question

When is whistle-blowing appropriate and when is it inappropriate, according to Bok?

A) Whistle-blowing is always appropriate when there is evidence of wrongdoing, regardless of the consequences.

B) Whistle-blowing is appropriate when the harm prevented by disclosure outweighs the harm caused by the breach of confidentiality.

C) Whistle-blowing is inappropriate when it conflicts with personal values, even if there is evidence of wrongdoing.

D) Whistle-blowing is appropriate only if it aligns with legal obligations, irrespective of the potential harm caused.

Answer 1

Whistle-blowing is appropriate when the harm prevented by disclosure outweighs the harm caused by the breach of confidentiality.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to Bok, whistle-blowing is appropriate when the harm prevented by disclosure outweighs the harm caused by the breach of confidentiality. This means that if the wrongdoing being exposed is significant and the potential harm from not reporting it is greater than the harm caused by breaking confidentiality, whistle-blowing is considered appropriate.

For example, if a company is engaging in illegal activities that could harm the public or the environment, it would be appropriate for an employee to blow the whistle to prevent potential harm. However, whistle-blowing may be considered inappropriate when it conflicts with personal values, even if there is evidence of wrongdoing.