Question

How does Kipnis think the distinction between personal morality and professional morality is relevant to the issue of the moral permissibility of breaching medical confidentiality?

A) Kipnis argues that personal and professional morality should always align, making the breach of confidentiality morally impermissible.

B) Kipnis suggests that the distinction allows for flexibility, permitting breaches in certain professional contexts while maintaining personal moral integrity.

C) Kipnis believes that personal morality is irrelevant to professional decisions, and breaches of confidentiality are permissible if required by professional duties.

D) Kipnis asserts that breaching medical confidentiality is universally morally impermissible, regardless of the distinction between personal and professional morality.

Answer 1

Kipnis suggests that the distinction between personal morality and professional morality allows for flexibility in the moral permissibility of breaching medical confidentiality.

Step-by-step explanation:

Kipnis believes that the distinction between personal morality and professional morality is relevant to the issue of the moral permissibility of breaching medical confidentiality because it allows for flexibility and consideration of professional duties. According to Kipnis, personal and professional morality may not always align, and there can be situations where breaching confidentiality is morally permissible in certain professional contexts while maintaining personal moral integrity.