Final answer:
Anderson satirises the language through a minimalist style that leaves much unsaid and creates uncertainty, contrasting with Shakespeare's rich, rhetorical language and Carroll's nonsensical yet expressive poetry.
Step-by-step explanation:
Anderson satirises the language by adopting a minimalist approach, stripping the prose to its core and relying heavily on dialogue without indicating speech intonation. This technique, as seen in Carver's work, results in a sense of uncertainty for the reader and depicts the characters conversing without truly communicating. The purposeful omission of detailed descriptions and the colloquial, yet limited, conversations highlight the gap between speech and understanding. This can be contrasted with Shakespeare's rich use of language where figures of speech like alliteration or onomatopoeia enhance the text, something that tends to be lost in modern simplifications. Furthermore, in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass, Humpty Dumpty's literal interpretation of Jabberwocky illustrates the heresy of paraphrase, proving that meaning in poetry is inseparable from its form and structure. Recognizing that language is not merely a vessel for communication but also a medium for artistic expression, Anderson's satire extends to how language is employed in different literary works and in the real-life political arena.