Final answer:
The statement highlights the importance of critical thinking in evaluating information sources, rather than taking authoritative sources at face value. It suggests employing methods like the SIFT approach to assess the accuracy and reliability of information. Critical thinking enables individuals to approach knowledge with necessary skepticism and acknowledges the ongoing process of reviewing and critiquing established ideas.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "that relying on authority does not guarantee that you will get the right answer" emphasizes the importance of critical thinking in the context of knowledge acquisition. This statement suggests that we should not accept information as correct solely because it comes from an authoritative source. Instead, we need to practice epistemic humility, recognizing the limits of human knowledge and the need to rigorously evaluate sources regardless of their authority.
Students are often exposed to various sources of information, including those considered authoritative, like textbooks or peer-reviewed journals. However, these sources might not always be reliable or free from bias. The SIFT method—Stop, Investigate the Source, Find better coverage, and Trace claims, context, and quotes—is a recommended approach for evaluating the reliability of sources. This method underscores the need for researching beyond surface-level information. It's crucial to consider the author's expertise, potential biases, and whether the work has undergone peer review.
Finally, critical thinking is about considering other viewpoints, assessing the trustworthiness of information, using evidence to support claims, and being open to ongoing review and criticism. It allows individuals to make more informed decisions and avoid pitfalls like the Dunning-Kruger effect or the Gambler's fallacy. By engaging in critical thinking, we can progress beyond accepted norms and superstitions that history has proven to be incorrect.