Final answer:
The statement "Experts and novices represent problems in similar ways but differ in their ability to solve them" is false. Experts can leverage intuition and pattern recognition, while novices may not grasp the deeper nuances and are prone to misjudge their own competence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that experts and novices represent problems in similar ways but differ in their ability to solve them is FALSE. While both experts and novices may encounter the same problems, their approaches and problem-solving abilities are not at all the same.
Experts typically possess a high level of knowledge in their field, which allows them to have a good sense of the solution before they even conduct a detailed analysis. This expertise enables them to be alert to potential errors and encourages them to scrutinize their work more closely.
On the other hand, novices may overestimate their abilities due to the Dunning-Kruger effect, where they perceive their knowledge to be greater than it actually is, leading to misjudgments.
Furthermore, experts often adopt a deeper level of engagement when encountering problems, viewing them as opportunities for advanced learning and insight. In contrast, novices might view problems as mere applications of learned algorithms, missing the complex nuances that experts recognize.
Experts are also more likely to recognize and utilize patterns and intuitive understanding fostered by experience, while novices should be wary of relying heavily on intuition that can be flawed.