Final answer:
The claim that automatic graphing software does not require accuracy checks is false. Even with the use of software tools for graphing and calculations, human verification is vital to ensure the correctness of the data input and output.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the main advantage of automatic graphing software is that you do not have to double-check the accuracy like you do with human-generated graphing is False. While automatic graphing software, such as computer spreadsheets, statistical software, and graphing calculators, can tremendously expedite calculations and graph plotting, users must still verify the accuracy of the input data and be aware of any limitations or errors of the software.
Automatic graphing tools might introduce their own errors, especially if the data is entered incorrectly or the parameters for graphing are not set properly. Furthermore, the analytical method is cited to be more accurate than the graphical method due to limitations in the precision of drawing when creating graphs by hand. This demonstrates that accuracy is not solely dependent on the method of graph production—be it manual or automatic—but also on the methodology and precision of the entire process.
Additionally, while statistical software can easily calculate means, medians, modes, and create best-fit lines, the final results should still be checked for plausibility and correctness. Therefore, regardless of the convenience and power of these tools, human oversight and verification remain essential components of the graphing process.