Final answer:
The statement that 'Bitcoin is good for the environment' is generally considered false due to its high energy consumption and reliance on fossil fuels for electricity. In contrast, it is true that the market revolution in the early 19th century brought significant social and economic changes to the United States.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Bitcoin is good for the environment' is often considered false. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies require a significant amount of energy to power the computers needed for the mining process where new bitcoins are generated and transactions are verified. The overwhelming majority of mining operations globally use electricity generated from fossil fuels, which contributes to carbon emissions and environmental degradation.
In contrast, the market revolution, which occurred in the United States during the early 19th century, did bring many social and economic changes. The development of new transportation technologies, communication advancements, and shifts in production methods changed the way Americans lived and worked. This transformation led to the growth of markets and the increase in the exchange of goods and services, thus it is true that the market revolution brought about significant shifts in society and the economy.