Final answer:
The case that reinforced the view of Viscount Dillhorne in Suisse Atlantique 1967 is Photo Productions v Securior Transport Ltd 1980. This ruling emphasized the importance of interpreting contracts based on their actual wording, a view consistent with Viscount Dillhorne's approach.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which case reinforced the view of Viscount Dillhorne in Suisse Atlantique 1967. The answer is c) Photo Productions v Securior Transport Ltd 1980. In the Suisse Atlantique case, Viscount Dillhorne expressed views on the approach to interpreting commercial contracts, emphasizing the importance of the actual language used in the agreement. Similarly, in Photo Productions v Securior Transport Ltd, the court reinforced the view that the terms of the contract should be the primary guide in determining parties' intentions and obligations.
It is important to understand that the ruling in Photo Productions upheld the principles of contractual interpretation that consider the words of the contract itself, without broadening the interpretation based on presumed intentions that are not clearly stated within the contractual terms. This perspective aligns closely with the interpretation rules highlighted by Viscount Dillhorne in the earlier case of Suisse Atlantique.