Final answer:
Historical context suggests that it is inappropriate to assume a person's literacy or understanding, particularly considering past high rates of illiteracy and discriminatory practices such as literacy tests. Improved education has changed literacy rates, but language biases can affect assumptions about abilities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of what Mellish stated about assuming a person's abilities does not have a direct quote provided; however, based on societal changes and historical context, the most appropriate answer seems to suggest that one cannot make broad assumptions about a person's abilities. In the 1800s, illiteracy was common due to limited access to education, meaning it was unlikely that a typical person could be assumed to read and understand English. Over time, literacy rates have improved significantly, but historical practices like literacy tests during voter registration, which were used discriminatorily, highlight that such abilities could not always be presumed. It is essential to recognize language biases and how they play into our assumptions about individuals' abilities. For instance, African American Vernacular English (AAVE) or accents may lead to assumptions that do not reflect a person's actual abilities or knowledge. I don't have specific information about a statement made by someone named Mellish regarding the assumption of a person's abilities. Mellish is not a widely recognized figure in a legal or notable context based on my knowledge up to January 2022. If this statement is from a legal context or a specific field, it's recommended to check legal documents, publications, or other relevant sources for accurate information. Without more context, I'm unable to provide a specific answer regarding Mellish's statement on the assumption of a person's abilities.