Final answer:
Science contributes to moral debates by providing empirical data and insights into human behavior, which can inform our understanding of ethical issues, while moral judgments often incorporate values beyond scientific scope.
Step-by-step explanation:
While science may not be equipped to answer moral questions directly, as they fall outside the realm of empirical measurement that defines the scientific method, it can still play a crucial role in informing moral debates. For instance, the scientific study of human behavior and the brain can provide insights into the nature of human reasoning and the psychological factors that influence ethical decision-making. In environmental ethics, scientific findings about the consequences of pollution or climate change can inform our understanding of our moral responsibility toward the environment and future generations. Technology derived from scientific advancement can also challenge existing moral frameworks, necessitating new ethical considerations, as seen in the rise of artificial intelligence and biotechnology. Moral debates often benefit from the clarity that scientific data can offer, even though the ultimate moral judgments might rest on values and principles that science itself does not address.