Final answer:
The Health Belief Model developed in 1958 assumes individual knowledge leads to action, but is criticized for ignoring environmental influence and placing the burden solely on individuals. Social cognitive theory, by contrast, considers the interplay of personal factors, behavior, and environment, emphasizing self-efficacy in behavior change.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Health Belief Model (HBM), developed in 1958 by U.S. Public Health Service social psychologists, posits that before individuals take action on their health, they need to know what action to take and how to do it. A major criticism of the HBM is that it places the entire burden of action on the individual, which may not account for socio-economic and environmental factors influencing health behaviors. In addressing the limitations of HBM, it's crucial to consider the role of social cognitive theory, which incorporates the influence of social environment and personal factors on behavior.
Social cognitive theory, especially as articulated by Albert Bandura, emphasizes the concept of self-efficacy—the belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations. Self-efficacy affects the choices people make, their motivations, and their perseverance against obstacles. This theory also addresses the interactive nature of individuals with their environment, proposing a reciprocal determinism where personal factors, behavior, and environmental factors all interact and influence each other.
Therefore, while the HBM suggests that knowledge and intention precede action, it's crucial to recognize the broader context of individual behavior that social cognitive theories embrace. This understanding challenges the notion that individuals solely carry the responsibility for behavior change without considering systemic influences, which is the central criticism of the HBM's approach to health-related behavior change.