Question

Self Review can be a threat to professionalism when:

Option 1: It promotes collaboration
Option 2: It lacks objectivity (Correct)
Option 3: It encourages continuous improvement
Option 4: It enhances individual accountability

Answer 1

Self-review threatens professionalism when it lacks objectivity because it can lead to unreliable performance assessments and biased self-reflection.Discussions about variability in assessments can facilitate learning and improvement.

Step-by-step explanation:

Self-review can be a threat to professionalism when it lacks objectivity. This lack of objectivity can lead to unreliable assessments of an individual's performance. As indicated by Atkins and Wood (2002), both self and peer ratings can be inconsistent and supervisors might underrate employees based on their self-assessments, which could be modest. Nevertheless, Tornow (1993b) argues that variability in ratings could provide a learning opportunity through discussions about discrepancies, thereby contributing to continuous improvement. Peer review also plays a crucial role in improving professionalism by providing outside perspectives, particularly in writing and compositions. Meaningful feedback from peers, especially when given following the principles of tactfulness and consideration, helps identify areas for revision and improvement before the final evaluation stage. The process of peer review, and the subsequent revision of work based on feedback, is a fundamental aspect of scientific research, writing, and various professional activities. This ongoing exchange of critique and refinement underscores the self-correcting and iterative nature of professionalism.