Final answer:
Singer's Strong Principle relates to the ethical obligation to prevent harm, when possible, exemplified by the drowning child scenario. It challenges concepts of moral responsibility, underlining that inaction can equate to causing harm.
Step-by-step explanation:
The discussion about Singer's Strong Principle, typically related to ethics and moral philosophy, revolves around the idea that if it is within our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought to do it. This principle is often illustrated using hypothetical scenarios, such as the child drowning in a pond, to challenge our intuitions about moral responsibility and the extent of our obligations to help others. The drowning child example tests our willingness to act and save a life despite personal inconvenience. It brings to the forefront that inaction can be morally equivalent to causing harm.
Singer's Strong Principle evokes discussions around the expectations of individuals when faced with emergencies like drowning situations. It is important to dispel common myths surrounding drowning, such as the belief that a person who is drowning will shout and wave for help, which has been proven false. The aforementioned scenario serves as an ethical parallel to the counterexample where Susan, in charge of children, can be seen as responsible for harm because of her negligence, thus emphasizing the moral weight of our choices and responsibilities.