60.0k views
4 votes
Give specific examples of two of the practicalities to be considered when conceptualizing a test.

a) Standardization and Norming
b) Face validity and Content validity
c) Test length and Time constraints
d) Convergent and Discriminant validity

User YourHelper
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

When conceptualizing a test, it is important to consider practicalities such as standardization and norming, face validity and content validity, test length and time constraints, and convergent and discriminant validity.

Step-by-step explanation:

Standardization and Norming: When conceptualizing a test, it is important to consider standardization and norming. Standardization involves administering the test to a large population in a consistent manner to ensure that the scoring and interpretation of results are consistent. Norming involves comparing the scores of different groups to establish reference scores, or norms, for future interpretations.

Face validity and Content validity: Face validity refers to how well a test seems to measure what it is intended to measure on the surface. Content validity, on the other hand, refers to how well the test covers the content domain it is supposed to measure. For example, if you are creating a test on math skills, the test should include a range of questions that cover different math concepts and skills.

Test length and Time constraints: Test length and time constraints are practicalities that must be considered when conceptualizing a test. Test length refers to the number of items or questions included in the test. Longer tests may provide more accurate assessments, but they also require more time to complete. Time constraints refer to the amount of time available for test administration. It is important to ensure that the test can be completed within a reasonable time frame.

Convergent and Discriminant validity: Convergent validity refers to how well a test correlates with other measures of the same construct. For example, if a test is designed to measure intelligence, it should correlate positively with other measures of intelligence. Discriminant validity, on the other hand, refers to how well the test does not correlate with measures of unrelated constructs. For example, a test of intelligence should not correlate strongly with measures of creativity.

User Flywheel
by
6.9k points