Final answer:
When applying a cusp cap, one must consider material compatibility, cost of implementation, and structural integrity. Sources of error can arise from material property assessment and design miscalculations. Not all materials are suitable across the same temperature ranges, which is a critical selection criterion.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the implementation of a cusp cap, it is important to take into account several factors for a successful application. Material compatibility is crucial as the cusp cap material must function well with the existing structure it's being applied to. This includes considerations of whether the materials can withstand similar ranges of temperature and if there are any chemical or physical interactions that may compromise integrity. Cost of implementation also plays a significant role in deciding whether a particular solution is viable. It encompasses both the initial cost of materials and labor, as well as any long-term maintenance costs. Lastly, structural integrity is paramount. The cusp cap must preserve or enhance the strength of the original structure and be able to endure the operating conditions it will face.
Sources of error in this context could include incorrect assessment of the material properties, miscalculations in the design phase, or unforeseen environmental stressors that affect the material performance. Additionally, not all tested materials will be effective in the same temperature ranges, which can present a significant source of error if not properly accounted for during the design and selection process.