Final answer:
Mythic communities are not primarily formed from kinship, but through shared rituals and symbolism that emphasize collective values, often strategically constructed by the state. Despite this, new myths created, such as those by the Bolsheviks, exhibit universal qualities because they draw from the collective unconscious, demonstrating commonalities with myths from the past and different cultures.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mythic communities are formed through shared rituals, symbolism, and collective identity. They do not primarily arise from kinship, which is more about familial ties and relationships. The creation of mythic communities can involve a strategic construction by the state and media, as was the case with the Bolsheviks after the Russian Revolution. These new mythic communities emphasized collective welfare over individual fulfillment, in line with their socialist ideals, contrasting with communities where personal achievements are more highly valued.
An example of such myth-making can be seen with Lenin's decree following the 1918 revolution, where symbols of the tsars were dismantled to forge new myths suiting the socialist state. These Soviet myths, although crafted for a new society, drew from the universal collective unconscious, demonstrating similarities with other societies' myths, despite their differences in origin. Lévi-Strauss' analysis of myths through binary oppositions (such as good/evil) also notes the common structural formations within myths across varied cultures. This reinforces the idea that mythic narratives often share structurally similar elements, even when created under different social and political circumstances.