Final answer:
The parenthetical phrase in the statement is the conclusion of an inductive argument based on the pattern of observing several instances of a phenomenon and then drawing a generalized conclusion from those observations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question "All ravens I've seen up to now have been black, so the next raven I see will be black" illustrates an argument where the conclusion is drawn based on the observation of several instances. This type of reasoning is inductive, where specific observations lead to a generalized conclusion. The parenthetical portion of the statement is indeed the conclusion of this inductive argument. It's based on the pattern where individual instances (all previously seen ravens being black) support a general conclusion (the next raven seen will also be black). However, one must be cautious with this form of reasoning, as inductive arguments are not foolproof. The conclusion rests on the likelihood that past patterns will continue into the future, and while this can be a reasonable assumption, it doesn't guarantee certainty. In this instance, our premises (individual sightings of black ravens) seem to support our conclusion, but it's important to acknowledge this is not necessarily a confirmation that every raven is black. There might be alternative arguments or instances (unseen non-black ravens) that could challenge the conclusion. Therefore, while the pattern is suggestive, it does not constitute conclusive evidence.