Final answer:
The argument that a married person is not a bachelor is logically valid, as the status of being married excludes the possibility of being a bachelor, which is based on deductive reasoning and definition.
Step-by-step explanation:
The argument "He is married, so he is not a bachelor" is valid. The concept of a bachelor is traditionally defined as a man who is not married. Therefore, if a person is married, by definition, they cannot be a bachelor. This statement uses deductive reasoning, where the conclusion logically follows from the premise. It is a demonstration of logical validity, not a reflection of the moral standing or personal behavior of the individual in question.
It is important to differentiate between the logical structure of an argument and any potential fallacies of weak induction that might arise from judging the quality of an argument based on the person presenting it rather than its inherent logical soundness. In logic, the truth of a statement is judged independently from the characteristics or actions of the individual asserting it.