4.4k views
3 votes
Binky told me that the ladies that work in the cafeteria spit in the soup. I'm never going to eat soup at that cafeteria again.

a) this argument is invalid, but strong
b) this argument is invalid, but weak
c) this argument is valid, and so is neither strong nor weak

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The argument is invalid and weak because it is based on a limited number of instances and does not provide enough evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument presented is invalid and weak.

Basing the conclusion that the cafeteria is bad solely on two instances of eating there is not enough evidence to make such a general claim. It is important to consider that individual experiences may vary, and the actions of a few individuals do not represent the entire staff of the cafeteria.

In order to make a stronger argument, it would be necessary to gather more evidence and examples to support the claim.

User Biox
by
8.7k points