Question

The opponents of ____________________ hold that in the long run, there may be far less music available because artists and publishers will have far less incentive to create and disseminate music.

Answer 1

The opponents of weak intellectual property laws hold that there may be less music available in the future because artists and publishers will be less incentivized to create. Historical and modern contexts show the importance of laws and supports for the survival and prosperity of the music industry.

Step-by-step explanation:

The opponents of weak intellectual property enforcement argue that diminishing incentives could lead to less music being available over time. Artists and music publishers may lack the motivation to create and distribute new works if they cannot reliably benefit from their creations. This concern is rooted in the idea that intellectual property laws, like copyrights discussed in the MGM Studios v. Grokster case, are vital for the creative industries to thrive.

History has shown that during times of economic depression, like the era of the Works Progress Administration (WPA), government support was essential to sustain artists and musicians, which suggests that without such support or proper incentive structures, the arts could suffer greatly. In the modern era, while technologies like streaming services have changed how we access music and video, the need for legal frameworks to balance artists' rights and consumer access remains critical. The phenomenon of artists independently producing CDs and using platforms like Amazon to reach audiences is a testament to the evolving music industry dynamics in response to changing market demands and technology.