Final answer:
Neither Rule 1 nor Rule 3 regarding significant figures requires downcasting, as that concept is not applicable to Chemistry but to programming. Downcasting is utilized in programming to access specific subclass features from a superclass reference.
Step-by-step explanation:
When discussing the rules related to significant figures in Chemistry, the necessity for downcasting occurs when you convert a broadly typed variable (superclass) to a more specific typed variable (subclass). However, the provided pre-reading material seems to refer to significant figure rules, not object-oriented programming concepts. Based on the information given regarding significant figures:
- Rule 1 states that all non-zero numbers are significant.
- Rule 3 specifies that leading zeros are not significant.
Since downcasting is a programming concept, it does not apply directly to the rules of significant figures. Evaluating the context of the given rules, neither of these rules would result in a situation where downcasting is necessary as they pertain to the identification of significant digits in a numerical value. Therefore, without explicit programming rules provided in the context of Object-Oriented Programming, we cannot accurately determine which rules might mandate downcasting.
If the context were related to programming, downcasting would usually be necessary when you have a reference of a superclass and need to access methods or properties that are only available in a subclass, implying that the specific types of the objects are known and a narrower type is desired. This operation carries a risk of causing a ClassCastException at runtime if the object is not an instance of the subclass being cast to.