Question

Could we recode the Deck class's fill method to eliminate the c variable? Could we invert the for loop nesting (inner becomes outer and outer becomes inner)? Select one:

a. Yes, Yes
b. Yes, No
c. No, Yes
d. No, No

Answer 1

The possibility of removing the variable 'c' or inverting for loop nesting in the Deck class's fill method depends on the specific logic implemented in the method's code, which is not provided.

Step-by-step explanation:

Without specific access to the code for the Deck class's fill method, a general answer to this question would depend on the context in which the fill method is used and what the variable c represents. In most cases concerning loops and array or collection population, variables used as counters or iterators can often be removed or restructured. However, without seeing the specific code, it's not possible to guarantee that c can be eliminated without changing the function's outcome.

Inverting the for loop nesting (making the inner loop become the outer and the outer loop become the inner) often depends on the logic of the code. For instance, if you are iterating over two dimensions, like a grid or a deck of cards, the order of loops represents the hierarchy of how the elements are accessed. Sometimes they can be inverted without changing the outcome, while in other cases, the order of loops is critical for the logic.