Final answer:
The correct rule for upcasting cannot be determined without additional context as the provided information references significance, not upcasting. Rule 1 is repeatedly mentioned regarding significance and could be related to upcasting if it infers a subclass can be seen as its superclass.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to the concept of upcasting in object-oriented programming, a principle that allows an instance of a subclass to be treated as if it were an instance of the superclass. Without the specific Rules being clearly defined within the question, we cannot provide a definitive answer as to which option makes upcasting possible. However, based on the context given, it seems that Rule 1 is consistently referred to as relevant for determining significance, and it may possibly also be applying to the concept of upcasting. If Rule 1 refers to the allowance of a subclass instance to be seen as a superclass instance without an explicit cast, then it would be key to upcasting. Rule 2 is not mentioned in the context of significance, and Rule 3 refers to the non-significance of leading zeros, which doesn't directly relate to upcasting. Therefore, without additional information, we cannot determine which rule(s) apply to upcasting.