Final answer:
Support for electronic voting machines includes their efficiency and modern interface, while opposition includes security risks and lack of verifiable paper trail. The Florida 2000 election underscores potential issues with older systems and the need for reliable, auditable voting technology.
Step-by-step explanation:
Arguments on Electronic Voting Machines
When discussing the adoption of direct recording electronic voting machines, there are arguments both supporting and opposing their use. In support of electronic voting machines, proponents argue that they are more efficient and can process votes quicker than traditional methods, which minimizes the chance for human error. These machines, like touch-screen devices, provide a modern interface that can be easier for voters to use, potentially increasing accessibility and reducing confusion at the polls.
Opposing the adoption of electronic voting machines, critics point to security concerns. Many computer security experts are wary of these machines due to their perceived vulnerability to hacking and tampering. Additionally, the lack of a paper trail with most touch-screen voting systems can be problematic for verifying votes in the case of a recount or audit, which could challenge the integrity of the electoral process.
Florida 2000 is often cited as an example of the issues with older voting systems, like punch-card machines, and the controversy around recounting votes emphasizes the need for reliable voting technology that produces verifiable records.