Final answer:
Comments in the Comment section should avoid being vague and instead provide clear and actionable feedback, focusing on specific aspects of the work that need improvement or are well done. Constructive criticism, specificity, and open-mindedness are essential qualities for making comments that are genuinely helpful to the recipient.
Step-by-step explanation:
The information that might typically go in the Comment section of a document or peer review process can vary in specificity and usefulness. Vague comments such as "revise this" are not helpful since they don't provide clear direction. On the other hand, somewhat helpful comments provide a general idea of what needs to be improved and why, yet they still lack comprehensive guidance on how to make those improvements. Specific and clear comments are the most useful as they pinpoint exactly what is good or needs revision, and offer clear, actionable advice on how to revise. For example, suggesting to rephrase a question so that it provokes a more enriched discussion rather than a simple yes-or-no answer can significantly improve a writer’s work.
When adding a comment to a peer’s draft or in a communal discussion area like the "General course questions" section, it is important to maintain constructive criticism and treat others how you would like to be treated. Phrasing feedback in a way that is open-minded and backed by research or rationale enhances its value. Moreover, specificity is especially vital in online environments where written comments may be the sole form of communication.