Final answer:
Rule utilitarianism and social contract theory both consider consequences, but rule utilitarianism focuses on repeated actions while social contract theory explores the agreement between individuals and the state.
Step-by-step explanation:
One similarity between rule utilitarianism and social contract theory is that both theories consider the consequences of actions. Rule utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of following a rule of conduct, while social contract theory explores the consequences of abiding by the rules and regulations established in the social contract.
One difference between the two theories is that rule utilitarianism evaluates the consequences of a repeated act over time, assuming that the same rule will be followed in similar circumstances. On the other hand, social contract theory emphasizes the implicit agreement between individuals and the state, where individuals surrender certain rights and the state is responsible for protecting those rights.