Final Answer:
A good investigative report does not include Option 4 router settings.
Step-by-step explanation:
Investigative reports serve to convey information in a clear and concise manner, and inclusion of router settings can be irrelevant and counterproductive. While the methods of investigation (Option 1), litigation support reports (Option 2), and references (Option 3) are typically integral components of an investigative report, router settings fall outside the scope of necessary information.
Router settings are technical details that pertain to the configuration of network devices and are unrelated to the core content of an investigative report. Including such details can distract readers from the essential findings and dilute the report's overall impact.
Investigative reports are designed to present information systematically, focusing on the relevant aspects of the investigation. Router settings, being technical configurations for network devices, do not contribute to the substantive content of the report.
The report's purpose is to communicate investigative methods, findings, and supporting information concisely, and including router settings would be akin to incorporating extraneous technical details that do not align with the primary objectives of the document. Therefore, omitting router settings ensures that the report remains focused on its core elements, enhancing its clarity and effectiveness.