Final answer:
The debate on net neutrality and government responsibility in providing Internet access examines the need for equal treatment of data, the ramifications of the digital divide, and the regulatory role of the government. Net neutrality advocates stress the importance of fair data treatment to prevent a tiered Internet, while opponents argue against regulations that could dampen innovation and profitability.
Step-by-step explanation:
Debate on Net Neutrality and Internet Access
The discussion of whether preventing denial of service attacks is entirely possible reflects the broader challenges of cybersecurity within the shared network of the Internet. However, another significant debate centers around net neutrality and the role of the government in providing Internet access to citizens. Net neutrality advocates argue for an Internet where data is treated equally, preventing the creation of "fast" and "slow" lanes which could disadvantage smaller entities. On the other hand, opponents suggest that imposing common carrier status on ISPs would stifle profits and hinder service improvement and expansion.
The digital divide is an issue of concern, with varying opinions on whether Internet access should be a governmental responsibility, akin to utilities like water and electricity, or an individual's responsibility. The decision-making power lies with the Federal Communications Commission and the federal government to regulate broadband providers and strive for fair Internet access without segregating users into "haves" and "have-nots". The debate encompasses various facets of society, economics, and the essential principles of capitalism and democracy.