Final answer:
Repeating bad news at the end of a message does not solidify the position but may instead leave a lasting negative impression. It is better to restate the position as a conclusion, synthesizing evidence into a persuasive and balanced final message that maintains hope for action.
Step-by-step explanation:
Repeating the bad news in the closing of a message does not necessarily solidify your position. While it's important to be clear and consistent throughout a message, ending on a negative note can leave the audience with a lasting impression of pessimism or defeat. Instead, it is often advised to restate your position in the closing, synthesizing the evidence presented into a strong concluding statement that reaffirms the thesis.
Effective communication, especially in a political context, seeks to engage and persuade, rather than to discourage. This means crafting a conclusion that addresses concerns without diminishing hope. It is possible to make the audience aware of serious issues and encourage them to act, without necessarily leaving them with a sense of futility or desolation. Acknowledging the complexity of the real-world scenario, you can drive home a position with a balanced message that does not insist on a happy ending, but also doesn't close the door to potential solutions and actions.
Therefore, while the core message should be consistent throughout, the tone should be adjusted to invite constructive engagement rather than to end with dismal notes that might lead to disengagement. The concluding remarks should synthesize findings and reiterate the thesis of the message while encouraging proactive behavior and maintaining a delicate balance between presenting hard truths and inspiring hopeful action.