163k views
2 votes
Why do we have to investigate cognitive processes indirectly, and do not rely on other methods? (There are three reasons)

User EcksDy
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

We have to investigate cognitive processes indirectly for three reasons: behavior is observable but the mind is not, self-reporting can be unreliable, and cognitive biases and perceptual illusions can influence thinking.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reasons why we have to investigate cognitive processes indirectly and not rely on other methods are:

  1. Behavior is observable, but the mind is not. While we can see someone's behavior, understanding the underlying reasons for that behavior is more challenging. For example, we can observe someone crying, but we can't always determine if they are sad, in pain, or happy without further investigation.
  2. Unreliable self-reporting. Sometimes, individuals may be uncomfortable, unwilling, or unable to accurately answer questions about their thoughts and feelings. For example, infants can't explain why they are crying, and people may not always provide honest or accurate responses due to various factors.
  3. Cognitive biases and perceptual illusions. Our brains have evolved to think in certain ways that may not always result in optimal or accurate decision-making. Cognitive biases and perceptual illusions can influence our thinking and can be challenging to detect without indirect investigation.

User David Chelimsky
by
8.1k points