Final answer:
The necessary and proper clause has actually expanded the power of the national government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The necessary and proper clause has actually had the opposite effect of limiting the power of the national government. It is sometimes referred to as the elastic clause because it allows Congress to make laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its other powers. This clause has been interpreted broadly by the Supreme Court, expanding the powers of the federal government.
An example of the necessary and proper clause in action is the creation of the national bank. When Congress established the Bank of the United States in 1791, it argued that this was necessary and proper to carry out its power to collect taxes and regulate commerce.
In conclusion, the statement that the necessary and proper clause has limited the power of the national government is false. It has actually been used to expand the power of the federal government.