Final Answer:
The statement suggests that determining whether the submission was deliberate or inadvertent is impossible. However, the use of the word "impossible" implies a definitive conclusion, making it a deliberate statement. This introduces a paradox, as claiming impossibility contradicts the uncertainty expressed in the statement. Therefore, the submission being impossible to know is a deliberate choice, making the correct option False.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement poses a conundrum by asserting that the nature of the submission—whether deliberate or inadvertent—is impossible to discern. However, the term "impossible" introduces a level of certainty that clashes with the inherent ambiguity expressed in the rest of the sentence. If the determination were genuinely unknowable, the language should reflect uncertainty rather than asserting impossibility. The contradiction arises when the statement itself becomes a deliberate act—stating definitiveness where ambiguity should prevail.
Delving deeper, the word choice holds significance. "Impossible" implies a definitive, unalterable state, creating a paradox within the statement. The intentional use of such a strong term to describe the uncertainty introduces a deliberate element. The author, consciously or unconsciously, makes a definitive claim about the impossibility of knowing, revealing an intentional choice in language.
This paradoxical nature underscores the deliberate intent behind the submission's ambiguity, rendering the correct option as False. The acknowledgment of the linguistic intricacies involved in conveying uncertainty versus certainty is crucial in unraveling the layers of meaning embedded in such statements.