Final answer:
Colonial resistance was strongest where exploitation and suppression were gravest, influenced by desires for self-governance and the assertion of rights. Educated locals and political structures anticipating rights of protest underlined resistance movements, which varied in success based on a multitude of factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
Colonial resistance was strongest in regions where colonial rule was the most oppressive and exploitive, such as in the Democratic Republic of the Congo under Belgian control and the plantations in the Americas' rimlands. The intense exploitation of both people and resources, as well as the imposition of harsh policies and taxes, often spurred local populations to resist. Important factors influencing these movements included the desire for self-governance and the protection of local rights. Educated individuals, encounter with Western thought, and the expectation of rights as citizens also played a crucial role in catalyzing resistance. Comparing successful movements, like Ethiopia's war with Italy, against less successful ones reveals a complex array of factors, including military strength, international support, and the level of organization among the resistors.
Furthermore, political tension within colonial assemblies and the actions of colonial governors highlighted the struggle for power and self-government. The assertion of rights under the British Bill of Rights reinforced the colonists' belief in their entitlement to protest. Such tensions would culminate in protests leading up to revolutions, like the one seen in the American colonies.